With the Supreme Court's ruling on DOMA and Prop 8, there has been a lot of interesting kick back on my facebook and twitter feeds. I certainly welcome the opinions of everyone and support their right to express them. However, one frequent comment bothered me and I wanted to respond to it. I chose this forum because I don't want to get into an argument with anyone.
Several comments and retweets I've seen have lamented the fact that the courts in California (alternately the governor of California? I'm admittedly not super well-researched so I'm not sure which is accurate though I know the courts had at least something to do with it) had the power to overrule what the people made law via popular vote. In my view that's a necessary part of government (that should be used on occasion only when absolutely necessary). Majority rule minority right. That's what this is all about. So it didn't matter if Fauquier County, VA didn't want to integrate schools in 1970 right before my dad started kindergarten. There wasn't a choice, even though the majority there was opposed to the integration. The government said that you can't discriminate and separate but equal is not a thing (which I find somewhat relevant to this case as well). People were kicking and screaming and protesting, but the minority vote has rights just like the rest and integration happened. In my mind this is very similar (though I do completely support the right of all people (particularly those with religious reasons) to disagree with the decision).
I fully expect Stefanie to correct me if my understanding of the legality of any of this is flawed.
Also, if you google "supreme court gay marriage" (I was trying to find a picture) there's a cool rainbow around the search box.
